Big Tech and the media are taking a page out of their Hunter Biden playbook by censoring a new lawsuit filed at the Supreme Court.
Breitbart News reported that just before mid-night Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the United States Supreme Court challenging the election laws in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin claiming they violate the Constitution.
So I started looking for more analysis and wanted to see what the mainstream media was saying about the lawsuit. As of the writing of this post Google was censoring the story. Below is a screenshot of one of the Google searches I did.
As of the writing of this post Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, and the mainstream media ignored the lawsuit.
Texas argues that the states violated the elector’s Clause of the Constitution because the changes in voting rules and procedures were made through the courts or executive actions not through the state legislatures. The Lone Star State also argues that there different voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection clause.
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to let their legislatures appoint their electors:
Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.
This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
The media is starting to look like ostrich and burying their heads in the sand.